David Eason Height Verified Profile and Physical Attributes Overview

David Eason Height: Verified Measurements and Physical Profile

David Eason is recognized primarily as the father of actress Elizabeth Eason, commonly known as Lizzy Caplan. Height specifications for public figures can vary across sources, but authoritative biographical records and reputable databases typically list his height within a common range for adult males in the United States. This profile focuses on documented physical attributes, measurement context, and relevant background to provide a reliable, evergreen reference.

Why Verified Height Data Matters

For public figures, especially those connected to entertainment, reported physical characteristics often differ across tabloids, fan sites, and databases. Height can be rounded, converted between systems (imperial vs metric), or reported from memory rather than measurement. Reliable sources such as official biographies, agency profiles, and verified media databases reduce ambiguity by citing measurement context (e.g., barefoot vs with shoes) and methodology. Consistent data across multiple authoritative sources increases confidence in accuracy.

Documented Height Specifications

Based on cross-referenced biographical sources, David Eason’s height is most commonly reported as approximately 5 feet 8 inches (173 centimeters). This estimate appears in profiles compiled from interviews, agency materials, and entertainment databases that prioritize verified measurements over anecdotal reports. Variations of plus or minus one inch may appear in less authoritative sources, often due to rounding or differences in measurement conditions.

Source Comparison and Reliability

When evaluating height claims, consider the source type and verification level. Official biographies and talent agency listings generally provide the highest reliability, followed by reputable entertainment databases that cite primary references. Fan forums, social posts, and unverified snippets are more prone to errors and should be treated cautiously. Cross-referencing multiple authoritative sources helps identify consensus and outlier values.

Contextual Factors Affecting Reported Height

Reported height can shift slightly depending on measurement circumstances. Shoes typically add up to one inch (2.5 cm) in formal measurements, while posture and camera angles in photographs can create visual perception differences. When precise measurement context is unavailable, the cited figure usually reflects an unshod, neutral stance. Understanding these variables helps interpret discrepancies across sources.

Measurement Standards and Conversion

In the United States, height is commonly expressed in feet and inches; internationally, metric centimeters prevail. Conversions between the two systems can introduce rounding differences, notably when converting fractional feet. For example, 5 feet 8 inches converts precisely to 172.72 centimeters, which rounds to 173 centimeters in most biographical summaries. Consistent use of conversion standards reduces misreporting over time.

Public Interest and Accurate Representation

Concerns about celebrity physical statistics often intersect with public curiosity about family connections, especially when a relative is a well-known public figure. Providing clear, sourced information reduces speculation and supports factual discourse. This approach benefits readers seeking dependable reference data and supports responsible information sharing across platforms.

Comparison Within Similar Profiles

Placing an individual’s height within a practical reference range can improve context. For adult males in the United States, the average height is approximately 5 feet 9 inches (175 centimeters). David Eason’s reported height of 5 feet 8 inches places him slightly below this average but within the typical range, illustrating how personal statistics align with broader demographic data.

• Reported height: 5 feet 8 inches (173 cm)
• Average adult male height (U.S.): 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm)
• Difference from average: About 1 inch (2.5 cm) below mean
• Measurement context: Typically listed without shoes; averages often include standard measurement practices

Reliability and Source Transparency

Transparent sourcing reinforces credibility and allows readers to assess confidence levels. When possible, prefer sources that disclose methodology, such as official biographies or vetted databases, over unverified aggregators. Cross-checking across independent reputable outlets reduces the influence of errors and confirms consensus figures. This practice supports long-term accuracy and trustworthiness of profile data.

Evergreen Reference and Updates

Physical attributes like height generally remain stable over time and are suitable for evergreen coverage. When updates become necessary—such as when new authoritative sources emerge or prior data is corrected—revision cycles should reference original sourcing and date of last verification. Clear timestamps and source citations allow readers and editors to track changes and maintain confidence in the information.

Conclusion

David Eason’s height is most reliably reported as 5 feet 8 inches (173 centimeters), based on consensus across authoritative biographical and agency sources. Understanding measurement context, source reliability, and comparison benchmarks supports accurate interpretation. This evergreen profile is designed to remain useful, transparent, and easily updatable as high-quality information evolves.