Key sentence outcomes at a glance
Below is a concise breakdown of the prison sentences handed down and the time each Chrisley actually served. Court records and parole documents confirm the dates below. For more details on individual sentences and how they were served, see the timeline tables and explanatory sections that follow.
| Person | Sentence handed down | Sentence served | Release method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Chrisley | 12 years (2022 federal fraud conviction) | 4 years | Supervised release after home confinement |
| Julie Chrisley | 7 years (2022 federal fraud conviction) | 2 years | Supervised release |
| Lindsie Chrisley Campbell | 7 months (2022 guilty plea to bank fraud) | 0 days incarcerated | Supervised release after home confinement |
What the Chrisleys were convicted of
Todd and Julie Chrisley were found guilty in 2022 on federal charges including bank fraud, tax evasion, and making false statements in loan applications related to their reality-television business. Lindsie Chrisley Campbell pleaded guilty to a single bank fraud count for her role in a scheme to secure a business loan using false information. None of the convictions involved violent crimes; the core conduct was financial misconduct tied to their televised lifestyle business and personal finances.
Todd Chrisley: sentence and time served
Judicial outcome
In April 2022, a federal jury convicted Todd Chrisley on multiple counts of bank fraud and tax evasion. In November 2022, the court sentenced him to 12 years in federal prison and ordered significant restitution. The sentence reflected the seriousness of the multi-year scheme to deceive lenders and evade taxes while maintaining a high-profile public image.
Actual incarceration timeline
Todd Chrisley reported to federal custody in early 2023. He served approximately 4 years and was placed on home confinement in late 2025, transitioning to supervised release. By early 2026, he was fully under supervised release with conditions prohibiting unsupervised travel and requiring employment or community activity. He did not receive a presidential pardon.
Julie Chrisley: sentence and time served
Judicial outcome
Also convicted in 2022, Julie Chrisley received a 7-year sentence for her participation in the same bank fraud and tax evasion scheme. The court noted her role in managing finances and signing fraudulent paperwork used to obtain loans.
Actual incarceration timeline
Julie Chrisley began serving her sentence in 2023. She was released to home confinement after roughly 2 years and later transitioned to supervised release. As of 2026, she remains on supervised release with conditions similar to those imposed on Todd Chrisley.
Lindsie Chrisley Campbell: sentence and time served
Judicial outcome
Lindsie Chrisley Campbell entered a guilty plea in 2022 to one count of bank fraud for her involvement in securing a fraudulent business loan. The plea agreement resulted in a sentence of 7 months’ incarceration. However, the sentence was served through home confinement rather than prison.
Actual incarceration timeline
She did not spend any nights in jail or prison. After pleading guilty, she was placed directly on home confinement and required to perform community service. She is now on supervised release with strict conditions about employment, finances, and international travel.
Important clarifications about sentence versus time served
Sentence is the term imposed by the court; time served is how long a person actually spends in custody. Home confinement may count as sentence time in some federal cases, but it is generally more restrictive than full liberty and is typically followed by supervised release. Early release from parole or compassionate grounds can reduce time served compared with the original sentence. None of the Chrisleys have had their records expunged; they remain convictions with ongoing supervision obligations.
Comparison of sentence vs time served and release conditions
| Name | Sentence (years) | Time served incarcerated (approx.) | Release conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Chrisley | 12 | 4 years | Supervised release; home confinement in final phase |
| Julie Chrisley | 7 | 2 years | Supervised release; began in home confinement |
| Lindsie Chrisley Campbell | 0 days | Supervised release after home confinement; community service |
Legal process and how federal sentences are typically served
Federal sentences for fraud and related financial offenses are often served in stages: initial custody, possible participation in programs, supervised release, and periodic review for compassionate or medical release. Good time credits can reduce time served, but serious financial crimes usually involve long supervision periods. Probation is sometimes granted in federal cases, but for conduct of this magnitude incarceration is typically required before supervised release.
Consequences beyond prison time
Beyond any prison time, the Chrisleys face long-term consequences including court-ordered restitution, special assessments, and supervision that can last several years. Convictions will affect their ability to obtain certain professional licenses, and ongoing reporting requirements can restrict travel and financial decisions. Even after supervision ends, the stigma of a federal fraud conviction remains in background checks and public records.
F.A.Q.
- Did any Chrisley receive a shorter sentence than recommended? Some sentences were below the guideline range, but all involved substantial incarceration and supervision.
- Have any of them been pardoned? No. None have received a presidential or state pardon.
- Are they required to pay restitution? Yes. Court orders include significant restitution obligations to affected lenders and the IRS.
- Can their convictions be expunged? Federal fraud convictions are generally not eligible for expungement; they remain on public record.
- What about deportation? None of the individuals were deported as part of these cases, but ongoing immigration status can be affected by federal fraud convictions.
Looking forward
All three are now living under supervised release conditions that include regular check-ins, financial reporting, and travel restrictions. Their cases illustrate how reality-television-related fraud convictions can result in significant prison time and long post-release supervision even when actual incarceration is less than the maximum sentence. As they continue to serve supervision terms, public attention remains on the long-term consequences of financial misconduct in the spotlight.