The Conjuring House: Location, History, and Why It Matters

What Is the Real Conjuring House and Where Is It Located

The house featured in The Conjuring is a privately owned residence in Harrisville, Rhode Island, at 1677 Round Top Road. Built in 1763 and substantially remodeled in the 1800s, the property was the site reported by the Perron family between 1971 and 1980. The address is not publicly highlighted on exterior signage to protect the owners’ privacy. The events portrayed in the films dramatize complex claims investigated by Ed and Lorraine Warren; mainstream scholarship and skeptical researchers often interpret the case differently. This guide explains the verified location, documented history, and how the narrative evolved in popular culture.

Key Facts at a Glance

Historic Foundation and Property Background

The structure originated as a colonial farmhouse in 1763, situated in a rural section of what is now Burrillville. Over more than two centuries, the building saw significant alterations, including 19th-century expansions and updated utilities. Local histories note ordinary domestic use across multiple generations. Assessments by municipal preservation boards indicate solid, if altered, original timber framing and period finishes. Because it remains a working residence, strict privacy expectations limit outsider access to routine maintenance and non-intrusive research.

Architectural Timeline and Changes

• 1763: Initial construction as a vernacular farmhouse.
• c. 1840–1860: Major addition reorienting the main facade and adding a central chimney.
• 20th century: Introduction of electrical and plumbing systems, with sensitive restoration in the 1990s to preserve historic fabric.

Documented Events and Investigative Context

In 1971, the Perron family moved into the home and subsequently reported a range of unsettling phenomena, from knocking and footsteps to apparent interactions with unseen presences. Rhode Island State Police records from the period show routine calls about noise complaints, but no conclusive evidence of illegal activity was found. Paranormal researchers, including Ed and Lorraine Warren, conducted interviews on-site and compiled case notes that would later inform the film series. Academic reviews of the case note methodological gaps and mixed witness reliability, while acknowledging the genuine distress reported by family members.

Investigations and Public Reaction

• 1970s: Local officers respond to complaints; limited follow-up documentation.
• 1989: The Hillside Strangler book publication introduces the story to a broader audience.
• 2013–present: Continued media coverage revisits the case amid ongoing debate among believers and skeptics.

Separating Film Narrative from On-Site Reality

The Conjuring movies compress timelines, amplify visuals, and combine elements from multiple cases, which can obscure what actually occurred at the house. Verified accounts emphasize noise disturbances, subjective sensations, and emotionally charged interviews rather than overt cinematic spectacles. Independent investigators highlight the importance of distinguishing between lived experience and entertainment storytelling, noting that the real home contains no confirmed supernatural evidence by scientific standards. Understanding this gap helps audiences appreciate both the human story behind the claims and the limits of current investigative methods.

Practical Considerations for Visitors and Researchers

The property is not open to the public, and the owners have requested privacy. Attempts to approach the residence for non-essential reasons may be perceived as intrusive and are not supported by municipal authorities. For those interested in the historical and paranormal dimensions, local libraries, museums, and curated exhibits present documented materials without encroaching on residential boundaries. Researchers are encouraged to rely on accessible records, respect legal boundaries, and engage with the ethical dimensions of investigating private experiences.

Guidelines for Respectful Engagement

• Do not trespass or attempt to access the property.
• Consult published histories and municipal archives for factual context.
• Approach eyewitness accounts with sensitivity and methodological care.
• Recognize the distinction between personal testimony and independently verified evidence.

Broader Cultural Significance and Legacy

The Conjuring house has become a symbol of how historic sites can acquire layered meanings through popular narrative. The interplay of local history, family testimony, and mass-market storytelling illustrates the power of place in shaping collective imagination. Preservation efforts in Burrillville focus on maintaining ordinary historic buildings, not those tied to sensational tales, yet the attention has spurred interest in regional architectural heritage. By examining how such stories evolve, communities can better balance privacy, historical stewardship, and public curiosity.

Conclusion and Responsible Interpretation

The real Conjuring house location is a specific property in Harrisville, associated with intense personal reports and extensive media adaptation. Its standing as a private home requires that engagement with the site remain respectful and informed. Verified records confirm the address, construction date, and basic timeline of reported events, while ongoing debates reflect broader questions about belief, evidence, and narrative. For researchers, visitors, and general audiences, understanding these distinctions is essential for a clear, ethical view of how true places become enduring stories.